Neoplasia recurrence in the vaginal vault after surgical treatments for endometrial cancer

Authors

  • Gabriela Dutra Caiado Coelho Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP
  • Luis Felipe Montezano Avila Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP
  • Carolina Trabasso Ferraz de Oliveira Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP
  • Bruno Kehrwald-Balsimelli Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP
  • Bianca Lorayne de Almeida Viana Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP
  • Fernanda Sakata Matuda Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP
  • Hézio Jadir Fernandes Junior Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP.
  • Francisco Sandro Menezes Rodrigues Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37497/JMRReview.v3i00.56

Keywords:

Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Local recurrence, Vaginal Dome

Abstract

Objective: To compare local recurrence rates (vaginal dome) in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing conventional (open) hysterectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods: Narrative review of the literature, based on clinical, cohort and multicenter studies, published in the period between 2018-2022.

Results: In the retrospective cohort and multicenter studies reviewed, local recurrence rates were similar between the groups of women with endometrial cancer, operated via laparotomy and via laparoscopy, showing that the occurrence is not associated with the surgical technique chosen for the treatment. Efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic procedure were associated with survival and morbidity rates only.

Conclusion: There is no difference in local recurrence rates (vaginal dome) after conventional (laparotomic) and laparoscopic endometrial cancer treatment.

Author Biographies

Gabriela Dutra Caiado Coelho, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Luis Felipe Montezano Avila, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Carolina Trabasso Ferraz de Oliveira, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Bruno Kehrwald-Balsimelli, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Bianca Lorayne de Almeida Viana, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP

Fernanda Sakata Matuda, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Hézio Jadir Fernandes Junior, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP.

Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro, Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cardiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP.

Francisco Sandro Menezes Rodrigues, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cardiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Cirúrgica Interdisciplinar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

References

Kim S, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021;18(5):1153-1158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.52293

Monterossi G, et al. Minimally invasive approach in type II endometrial cancer: is it wise and safe? Jour Min Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(3):438-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.022

Dias M, et al. Perfil Epidemiológico das Mulheres com Câncer Ginecológico: um estudo multicasos, no Sul do Brasil. Braz Jour Develop. 2021;7(4):37025-37035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n4-254

Mouraz M, et al. Abordagem laparoscópica no estadiamento cirúrgico do carcinoma do endométrio. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(10):306-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688461

Rütten H, et al. Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Local and Systemic Treatment Options. Cancers. 2021;13(24):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246275

Janda M, et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2017;317(12):1224-1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.2068

Scaletta G, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review. Europ Jour Surgical Oncol. 2020;46(5):782-788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.519

Dai Y, Wang Z, Wang, J. Survival of microsatellite-stable endometrioid endometrial cancer patients after minimally invasive surgery: An analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas data. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(1):92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.684

Padilla-Iserte P, et al. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(65):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025

Yin M, Cai Y, Zhou L. Identifying the superior surgical procedure for endometrial cancer: A protocol of network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(33):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016855

Trigo AA; Guimarães NP, Silva GNA. Histerectomia: análise de dados comparativos entre técnicas videolaparoscópica e vaginal. Rev Elet Acer Med. 2022;8(4):1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25248/reamed.e10146.2022

Gallotta V, et al. Minimally invasive salvage lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer patients: a single institution series. Europ Jour Surgical Oncol. 2018;44(10):1568-1572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.006

Marconi MA, Lakatos EM. Fundamentos da metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas; 2017.

Ercole FF, Melo LS, Alcoforado CGC. Revisão integrativa versus revisão sistemática. Rev Min Enferm. 2018;18(1).

Hermont AP, Zina LG, Silva KD, Silva JM, Martins Júnior PA. Revisões integrativas: conceitos, planejamento e execução. Arq Odont. 2021; 57(1):3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2021.57.e01

Seracchioli R, et al. Is total laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma at risk of local recurrence? A long-term survival. Anticancer Research. 2005;25(1):2423-2428.

Nezhat F, Yadav J, Rahaman J, Gretz H, Cohen C. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer. Jour Min Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(2):181-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.006

Published

2024-02-14

How to Cite

Coelho, G. D. C., Avila, L. F. M., Oliveira, C. T. F. de, Kehrwald-Balsimelli, B., Viana, B. L. de A., Matuda, F. S., Fernandes Junior, H. J., & Rodrigues, F. S. M. (2024). Neoplasia recurrence in the vaginal vault after surgical treatments for endometrial cancer. Journal of Medical Residency Review, 3(00). https://doi.org/10.37497/JMRReview.v3i00.56

Most read articles by the same author(s)