Use of non-vascularized fibula graft for the treatment of bone defects in forearm fractures
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Forearm fractures
Bone defect
Non-vascularized fibular graft
Bone reconstruction
Autograft, Case report

How to Cite

Baruel, G. J. de G., Marques da Silva, L. F., Tescarolli, A., Buainain, R. P., Ninomiya, A. F., & Nonose, N. (2025). Use of non-vascularized fibula graft for the treatment of bone defects in forearm fractures. Journal of Medical Residency Review, 4(00), e087. https://doi.org/10.37497/JMRReview.v4i00.87

Abstract

Background: Open fractures of the forearm with segmental bone loss represent one of the greatest challenges in reconstructive orthopedics due to the anatomical and functional complexity of the radius and ulna. Non-vascularized fibula grafting (NVFG) has been proposed as an effective alternative in moderate bone defects, especially in services without microsurgery availability, presenting good consolidation rates and lower morbidity when compared to more complex techniques.

Aim: To report and critically analyze a case of segmental radius defect reconstruction with a non-vascularized fibula graft in a young patient who was the victim of high-energy trauma, followed up for 24 months.

Method: Case report study based on a retrospective review of hospital records and imaging exams. Clinical, surgical, and functional data were evaluated for a patient treated at a university hospital, with two years of outpatient follow-up.

Case Report: A 25-year-old female patient, victim of a car accident, presented with an open fracture of the radius and ulna with a 5 cm radial segmental defect. Initially, she underwent surgical cleaning, antibiotic therapy, and external fixation. Subsequently, reconstruction was performed with a 6 cm non-vascularized autologous fibula graft, fixed with a DCP plate. The evolution was favorable, with signs of bone integration in eight weeks, callus formation in six months, and complete consolidation in 12 months. After 24 months, the patient had preserved function, near-normal pronation-supination range of motion, and return to activities of daily living.

Conclusion: Non-vascularized fibula grafting proved to be a safe, effective, and viable alternative for reconstruction of segmental forearm defects in a hospital setting without microsurgery available. The case reinforces its applicability as a cost-effective technique, with good long-term consolidation and function results, provided there is adequate patient selection, careful surgical technique, and rigorous follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.37497/JMRReview.v4i00.87
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(5):574–9.

Hou Z, Yang P, Duan X, Zhang L, Tang P. Non-vascularized fibular autograft for the treatment of bone defects: an analysis of 98 cases. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(1):38–45.

Matsen FA, Antuña SA, Sperling JW. Autogenous bone grafting: basic science and clinical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(3):502–9.

Ekinci Y, Gürbüz K. Non-vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of upper extremity pseudarthrosis: is it an effective choice? Erciyes Med J. 2020;42(2):167–73.

Ren K, Zong Q, Chen Z, Han Y, Qi J, Xu W. Long-term follow-up of fibular graft for reconstruction of upper limb long bones. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(40):e12605.

Jupiter JB, Ring D. Treatment of unreconstructable diaphyseal defects of the forearm by free vascularized fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(6):791–8.

Weiland AJ, Moore JR, Daniel RK. Vascularized bone autografts: experience with 41 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(174):87–95.

Pho RW, Patradul A, Satku K, Kour AK, Leong JC, Lee HP. Free vascularised fibular graft in skeletal reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(4):607–10.

Toh S, Harata S, Tsubo K, Inoue S, Narita S, Sugimoto K. Secondary reconstruction of forearm bones by vascularized fibular graft. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18(5):558–63.

Minami A, Kasashima T, Iwasaki N, Kato H, Kaneda K. Vascularised fibular grafts. An experience of 102 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):1022–5.

Moran SL, Shin AY. Vascularized fibula graft for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Child Orthop. 2008;2(2):103–11.

Urbaniak JR, Cooney WP, Adams RA. The free vascularized fibular graft: a retrospective review of 122 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(7):1028–37.

Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H. Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(7):1039–58.

Doi K, Sakai K. Vascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of the extremities. Microsurgery. 1994;15(4):253–63.

Jupiter JB, Grossman JA, Currier BL. Vascularized bone grafts in upper limb reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17(5):836–42.

Boyer MI, Bowen CV, Weiland AJ. Vascularized bone grafting: indications, techniques, and results. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(4):594–602.

Lamberti PM, Donati D, Colangeli S, Mercuri M. The use of non-vascularized fibular grafts in the reconstruction of large bone defects after tumour resection. Int Orthop. 2012;36(1):239–45.

Saini R, Bali K, Bachhal V, Mootha AK, Dhillon MS, Gill SS. Non-vascularized fibular grafts in large bone defects. Med J Armed Forces India. 2011;67(4):333–8.

Toh S, Tsubo K, Nishikawa S. Reconstruction of large bone defects in the forearm by non-vascularized fibular grafts. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(6):477–83.

Gupta A, Kumar S, Singh AK. Outcome of non-vascularized fibular grafting in long bone defects: a clinical study. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(3):277–83.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.